In article <mailman.20.1543513461.716.bind-us...@lists.isc.org>, Christian Weiske <cwei...@cweiske.de> wrote:
> Hello Timothe, > > > > > I only get an error when running dig: > > > > > >> $ dig @2a01:488:66:1000:53a9:2dde:0:1 cweiske.de > > >> couldn't get address for '2a01:488:66:1000:53a:53': not found > > > > This looks like a typo. And the error doesn't match the command given. > > > > I suspect that your actual 'dig' command was 'dig > > @2a01:488:66:1000:53a:53 cweiske.de', which will reproduce the error. > > > > '2a01:488:66:1000:53a:53' is not an IPv6 address.ï¾ You are missing > > a :: or a couple of words.ï¾ (There should be 8 16-bit words delimited > > by ':', or a single '::' ellipsis to represent a run of zeroes.) > > You are right, this was no full IPv6 address. > > I'm sorry for the noise, but I didn't see the difference in the two IP > addresses. Otherwise I would not have subscribed to this list and > written my lenghty mail. > > I scrolled back my terminal and now found where I got that partial > address from: The output of "netstat -tulpen". The listening address is > shortened there, which I did not know before: > > > Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address > > udp6 0 0 2a01:488:66:1000:53a:53 :::* > > From there I copied it and tried to "dig @" my domain, which failed as > I wrote. > > Why there were different IPs in the command and the output of my > first example .. I have no idea. I somehow mixed up my notices. > > Sorry again. The last : in the netstat output is separating the IP address from the port number -- :53 means it's listening on port 53, the standard DNS port. But it also seems like it's using its own form of abbreviation, since there aren't 8 hex fields before that. -- Barry Margolin Arlington, MA
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
