I have been told this is a very poor description of the problem. What I am concerned about is, how people with a sort of lazy zone file can assess the potential impact of QNAME minimization on their ability to answer for all of their zones.
I have gotten two suggestions off list: - I would use named-checkzone to print the zone with all owner names printed out and then use text processing tools - “dig ds -f list-of-zones”, Those that return NXDOMAIN are likely missing NS records. Any other ideas? Has anyone done this kind of housekeeping on their own zones? > On Jul 26, 2018, at 11:41 AM, Victoria Risk <vi...@isc.org> wrote: > > Does anyone know of a good tool that you can run on your DNS records to find > parent + child pairs where there is no NS record for the child in the parent? > > Someone must have a perl script for that, right? > > Thank you for any suggestions. > > Vicky > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe > from this list > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users Victoria Risk Product Manager Internet Systems Consortium vi...@isc.org
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users