That is a valid consideration but being a slave doesn't always mean being in the NS records.
On Dec 18, 2017 9:47 AM, "Barry S. Finkel" <bsfin...@att.net> wrote: > On Sun, 17 Dec 2017 22:06:58 +0530, vijay bommareddy <vijayb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hello folks, >> >> I'm trying to find more information on the practical limitations of adding >> more slaves. >> Can someone tell me, how many number of slaves does BIND technically >> support? Is there a maximum limit per master server? >> >> Thank you >> Vijay >> > > A minor point - if there are too many slaves, then the NS list might > not fit into a UDP packet, causing TCP to be used. I do not know > how many NS records would be needed to exceed the UDP packet size; > it would depend upon the length of the nodenames of the DNS servers. > > --Barry Finkel > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to > unsubscribe from this list > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users >
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
