----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kevin" <bind-users...@thesandiegos.com>
> To: "Warren Kumari" <war...@kumari.net>
> Cc: "Kevin" <bind-users...@thesandiegos.com>, "bind-users"
> <bind-users@lists.isc.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 12:18:41 PM
> Subject: Re: head scratcher: nsupdate, Bind views, and TLSA record updates
> From: "Warren Kumari" <war...@kumari.net>
> To: "Kevin" <bind-users...@thesandiegos.com>
> Cc: "bind-users" <bind-users@lists.isc.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 11:28:58 AM
> Subject: Re: head scratcher: nsupdate, Bind views, and TLSA record updates
>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Kevin via bind-users
> <bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote:
>> I'm running into an odd issue with Bind 9.9.4 whereby I'm trying to run a
>> scripted nsupdate to rotate TLSA records. I'm running nsupdate via a Bash
>> script that executes the following nsupdate batch commands which are
>> directed to a Bind "view" that is accessible from the wider internet:
>>
>> server 1.2.3.4
>> zone example.com
>> key updatekey xyz123...
>> update delete _25._tcp.mail.example.com. TLSA
>> local 127.0.0.1
>> show
>> send
>>
>> And then:
>> server 1.2.3.4
>> zone example.com
>> key updatekey xyz123...
>> update add _25._tcp.mail.example.com. 3600 IN TLSA 3 1 1 abc123...
>> local 127.0.0.1
>> show
>> send
>>
>> I get the following output, all looks good:
>>
>> + Updating DNS 1.2.3.4: for ... ok.
>> + Updating DNS 1.2.3.4: for ... ok.
>>
>> I see the following in /var/log/messages, all looks good (updating the view
>> named "remote", responsible for answering queries from off-network sources):
>> Oct 31 10:28:19 test named[106]: client 127.0.0.1#33710/key updatekey: view
>> remote: signer "updatekey" approved
>> Oct 31 10:28:19 test named[106]: client 127.0.0.1#33710/key updatekey: view
>> remote: updating zone 'example.com/IN': deleting rrset at
>> '_25._tcp.mail.example.com' TLSA
>> Oct 31 10:28:19 test named[106]: zone example.com/IN/remote: sending
>> notifies (serial 165)
>> Oct 31 10:28:19 test named[106]: client 1.2.3.4#38629: view internal:
>> received notify for zone 'example.com'
>> Oct 31 10:28:19 test named[106]: client 127.0.0.1#56323/key updatekey: view
>> remote: signer "updatekey" approved
>> Oct 31 10:28:19 test named[106]: client 127.0.0.1#56323/key updatekey: view
>> remote: updating zone 'example.com/IN': adding an RR at
>> '_25._tcp.mail.example.com' TLSA
>>
>> But then when I try to do a query from remote, no TLSA record exists.
>>
>> $ dig @8.8.8.8 TLSA _25._tcp.mail.example.com +dnssec
>>
>> ; <<>> DiG 9.9.4-RedHat-9.9.4-51.el7 <<>> @8.8.8.8 TLSA
>> _25._tcp.mail.example.com +dnssec
>> ; (1 server found)
>> ;; global options: +cmd
>> ;; Got answer:
>> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 29421
>> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
>>
>> ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
>> ; EDNS: version: 0, flags: do; udp: 512
>> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
>> ;_25._tcp.mail.example.com. IN TLSA
>>
>> ;; Query time: 74 msec
>> ;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8)
>> ;; WHEN: Tue Oct 31 10:37:02 PDT 2017
>> ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 59
>>
>> Oct 31 10:33:12 test named[106]: query logging is now on
>> Oct 31 10:33:33 test named[106]: client 74.125.80.69#45732
>> (_25._tcp.mail.example.com): view remote: query: _25._tcp.mail.example.com
>> IN TLSA -ED (1.2.3.4)
>> Oct 31 10:33:36 test named[106]: client 1.2.3.4#39184
>> (74.165.37.177.in-addr.arpa): view internal: query:
>> 74.165.37.177.in-addr.arpa IN PTR + (1.2.3.4)
>> Oct 31 10:33:39 test named[106]: received control channel command 'querylog'
>>
>> I'm at a loss as to what's going on, any ideas?
>
> You've elided enough stuff that debugging/helping you is really hard,
> but at least one of the issues is that you are getting back SERVFAIL.
> This is almost defeintely a DNSSEC issue -- I'd suggest looking at
> DNSVIZ to fogure out why...
>
> W
>
> okay...done.
>
> After further debugging, it looks like nsupdate (or Bind) doesn't like
> underscores (that arrive via nsupdate). If I create a TLSA record using the
> same mechanism that doesn't contain underscore characters, all is right with
> the world and remote queries work as expected.
>
> However, given that TLSA records use a common record structure that requires
> underscores, this is a problem.
>
> Am I missing some obscure named.conf setting that needs to be relaxed to allow
> underscores in dynamically updated records?
>
> -Kevin
>>
I looked and already had "check-names {master|slave|response} ignore;" set at
the view level.
I next tried setting these options at the global level and there is no change
in behavior.
-Kevin
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
