I would also upgrade from BIND 9.9 to a later version of BIND to get the following which was introduced in BIND 9.10.0.
3673. [func] New "in-view" zone option allows direct sharing of zones between views. [RT #32968] Mark In message <CAAiTEH8pDNm9shbfwfZQD=zyf4g6c1tzotsxmuyy9y2j-mo...@mail.gmail.com> > > On 12 October 2017 at 11:03, Nikkil=C3=A4, Tommi <tommi.nikk...@cgi.com> wr= > ote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > My BIND (version 9.9.4-RedHat-9.9.4-51.el7) is displaying some odd > > behavior. When updating a zone, BIND randomly refuses to return the newly > > added and/or modified data for client. In my named.conf I have dozens of > > views, main interest in the following > > > > Each view keeps its own internal state for its zones. The way you appear > to have this configured, for any zone in 'common-slave.conf' you have > several versions stored (one per view) each trying to write to the same > state file (e.g. slave/db.207.31.172.in-addr.arpa). > > If I were to speculate (you'd want to do some more troubleshooting to > confirm), I would suspect you're running into problems with your views > stomping on each other's slave files. > -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users