Am 07.10.2017 um 20:17 schrieb Job:
Hi Reindl,
thank you!
not with named - unbound as resolver support's it
Perhaps do you know if DjbDns support this directive?
I thought putting a frontend DNS server before Bind...
go with unbound - you won't find anything better for a cachingonly
meaning non-autoritative dns-server these days
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Djbdns
Stable release
1.05 / 2001; 16 years ago
sorry, but this a terrible developer attitude, in the last 16 years a
lot of things happended in the DNS world
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
