Am 19.06.2017 um 15:25 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
those rejections were NOT caused by having two different PTRs.
They were caused by something different that is not a subject of this
thread - even one PTR of this format would cause rejections.
On 19.06.17 15:32, Reindl Harald wrote:
not directly but by the fact that someone was smart enough to reqest
a sane PTR and nother one was not somart enough to remove a useless
one, by just follow "1 IP has exactly 1 PTR - period" that never
would have been possible
You are in fact advising people to follow rule that does not exist.
This thread started because someone tried to follow rules that do not exist.
in all of these cases just remove the old useless generic PTR
would have solved the problem from the start
so please inform yourself and do tests.....
go reread the OP's question. He asked about "ns" and "mail" records.
there's no need to comment something noone did propose
since DNS don't care about the PTR but mail does what is your problem
that you need stupid dicussions instead just agree that it can't do
harm and in doubt is beneficial to have just one hostname, use that
one hostname in helo_name and have just one PTR pointing back to that
hostname?
I'm trying to avoid future problems caused by people who follow non-existing
rules by advising properly and explaining.
I have encountered many issues caused by people insisting on non-existing
rules and breaking thing just by trying to follow them.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I'm not interested in your website anymore.
If you need cookies, bake them yourself.
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
