On 01/18/2017 04:02 PM, lbutlr wrote:
> It looks like there are three version of Bindcurrently supported, 9.9.9, 
> 9.10, and 9.11.
>
> Are there specific reasons to move from 9.9 to 9.10 or 9.11 other than the 
> usual "it's newer and you're going to have to move at some point anyway"?
>
> Any gotchas?
For users of bind-dyndb-ldap (LDAP driver for BIND), there's a
significant change in BIND 9.11.

An API for dynamic database was accepted upstream, so patching the
upstream BIND is no longer necessary. However, the upstream API is a bit
different, which has two implications.

First, the minimal required version of bind-dyndb-ldap is the recently
released v11.0 [1].

Second, you have to transform your named.conf section which configures
the dynamic database to reflect the new API. You can see an example of
the new configuration format in the Configuration section of the README
file [2]. If you'd like to do this automatically, there is an upstream
pull request that has a sed script [3].

[1] - https://fedorahosted.org/released/bind-dyndb-ldap/
[2] - https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/bind-dyndb-ldap.git/tree/README.md
[3] - https://github.com/freeipa/bind-dyndb-ldap/pull/7

-- 
Tomas Krizek

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to