On 8 October 2016 at 09:57, Pol Hallen <bin...@fuckaround.org> wrote:
> 192.168.1/24 is not a valid netmask >> > > huh? > In linux and BSD I always use 192.168.1/24 (how shortcut of 192.168.1.0/24) > and so on... You're confusing network configuration with ACL syntax. Where you're using 192.168.1.50/24 in your OS configuration, what you're really saying is 192.168.1.50 netmask 255.255.255.0. When you use it in an ACL, you're saying "the entire /24 that contains 192.168.1.50" > hint: using /24 everywhere is nonsense >> > > why? > > My goal is allow 192.168.1.0/24 (net) and deny 192.168.1.50 (host) > > thanks > > Pol It sounds like what you want is to permit 192.168.1.0/24 and deny 192.168.1.50/32. > > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to > unsubscribe from this list > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users >
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
