Kevin Darcy wrote: > > In any case, multi-hop forwarding is always the least-preferred option. >
I wonder for which reason do you think this. Of course, any forwarding adds a additional hop and therefore additional delay and an additional possible point of failure. But this is true for any network-connection. So, what do you think are the DNS-specific downsides of forwarding? The only thing that comes to mind if I think about downsides of forwarding is that, if something goes wrong, the client only gets a generic SERVFAIL as errormessage instead of a specific explanation what exactly went wrong. Do you see other downsides to forwarding? Mit freundlichen Grüßen Robert Willmann -- Commerzbank AG Group Information Technology GS-IT 8.2.3 Core Services Postanschrift: 60261 Frankfurt am Main Geschäftsräume: Mainzer Landstr. 151, 60327 Frankfurt am Main Tel.: +49 69 136 - 290 71 Fax: +49 69 136 - 590 71 robert.willm...@commerzbank.com Commerzbank AG, Frankfurt am Main http://www.commerzbank.de Pflichtangaben http://www.commerzbank.de/pflichtangaben _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
