Casey Deccio <ca...@deccio.net> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Paul A <ra...@meganet.net> wrote: > > > Yes on both server and the slave and primary are listed on the NS RR. > > I'm really at a loss here, the zone updates on the slave but I keep > > getting that message. > > There's a difference between a server being listed in the NS RRset and a > server being authoritative for the zone. Is there a "zone" statement for > that zone in your named.conf?
When you query the slave for a problem zone, look at the flags in the header, e.g. this answer comes from a recursive query - "ra" is present and "aa" is missing ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 this answer comes from an authoritative zone - "aa" is present ;; flags: qr aa; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ - I xn--zr8h punycode South Thames, Dover: Southwesterly 5 or 6. Slight or moderate. Rain or showers. Good, occasionally poor. _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
