should I setup 192.168.1.1 as slaves to these two domains would that fix it?
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Jeff Sadowski <jeff.sadow...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On the samba mailing list they described setting up the DC as the NS and
> forward to another machine for more rules.
> This will work fine for one domain. Now lets say I have 2 domains.
>
> If I setup forwarders like so on 192.168.1.1
>
> zone "domainA" IN { type forward; forward only; forwarders { 192.168.2.1;
> }; };
> zone "domainB" IN { type forward; forward only; forwarders { 192.168.3.1;
> }; };
>
> It will cache entries for each domain and if a computer gets a different
> address for dhcp it will update on the domain's DNS but the dns on
> 192.168.1.1 will have a cached entry untill it expires.
>
> 192.168.2.1 and 192.168.3.1 are setup to forward all other zones than
> their domain names to 192.168.1.1
>
> if I have DNS server set for all machines in domainA to 192.168.2.1 all
> machines on domainA see any DNS changes to domainA imediately machines on
> domainB are cached and can take time to clear out.
> And
> if I have DNS server set for all machines in domainB to 192.168.3.1 all
> machines on domainB see any DNS changes to domainB imediately machines on
> domainA are cached and can take time to clear out.
>
> What is the best way to resolve this issue?
>
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
