Hi all, I have a problem with DNSSEC and I dont find a solution. Maybe someone can help me.
My intention is to run a bind which acts as DNSSEC enabled resolver for my internal LAN. This runs on a VirtualBox instance with OpenBSD 5.9. I got a precompiled package from OpenBSD, version is 9.10.3-P3. Configuring my named, I mostly followed a howto from Calomel.org: https://calomel.org/dns_bind.html This is my named.conf: root@bsd59n:/var/named/etc# egrep -v '^ *#|^ *$|^\/\/' named.conf acl clients { 127.0.0.0/8; 192.168.21.0/24; ::1; }; options { version ""; // remove this to allow version queries listen-on { 127.0.0.1; 192.168.21.101; }; listen-on-v6 { none; }; empty-zones-enable yes; allow-query { clients; }; allow-recursion { clients; }; allow-transfer { none; }; include "/etc/root_trusted_key"; dnssec-enable yes; dnssec-validation yes; }; logging { category lame-servers { null; }; }; zone "." { type hint; file "etc/root.hint"; }; zone "localhost" { type master; file "standard/localhost"; allow-transfer { localhost; }; }; zone "127.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "standard/loopback"; allow-transfer { localhost; }; }; As my named is running in a chroot jail, /etc/root_trusted_key is /var/named/etc/root_trusted_key in reality. root@bsd59n:/var/named/etc# root_trusted_key managed-keys { "." initial-key 257 3 8 "AwEAAagAIKlVZrpC6Ia7gEzahOR+9W29euxhJhVVLOyQbSEW0O8gcCjF FVQUTf6v58fLjwBd0YI0EzrAcQqBGCzh/RStIoO8g0NfnfL2MTJRkxoX bfDaUeVPQuYEhg37NZWAJQ9VnMVDxP/VHL496M/QZxkjf5/Efucp2gaD X6RS6CXpoY68LsvPVjR0ZSwzz1apAzvN9dlzEheX7ICJBBtuA6G3LQpz W5hOA2hzCTMjJPJ8LbqF6dsV6DoBQzgul0sGIcGOYl7OyQdXfZ57relS Qageu+ipAdTTJ25AsRTAoub8ONGcLmqrAmRLKBP1dfwhYB4N7knNnulq QxA+Uk1ihz0= "; }; root_trusted_key was generated as Calomel howto describes. Now, when I try to start named with that config, I get a courious error message: root@bsd59n:/var/named/etc# /usr/local/sbin/named -t /var/named -u _bind -U 4 -g 17-May-2016 21:53:14.644 starting BIND 9.10.3-P3 <id:bdaecad> -t /var/named -u _bind -U 4 -g 17-May-2016 21:53:14.644 built with '--enable-shared' '--enable-filter-aaaa' '--enable-threads' '--with-libt ool' '--without-readline' '--with-python=/usr/local/bin/python2.7' '--prefix=/usr/local' '--sysconfdir=/etc' '--mandir=/usr/local/man' '--infodir=/usr/local/info' '--localstatedir=/var' '--disable-silent-rules' '--di sable-gtk-doc' 'CC=cc' 'CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe' 17-May-2016 21:53:14.644 ---------------------------------------------------- 17-May-2016 21:53:14.644 BIND 9 is maintained by Internet Systems Consortium, 17-May-2016 21:53:14.644 Inc. (ISC), a non-profit 501(c)(3) public-benefit 17-May-2016 21:53:14.644 corporation. Support and training for BIND 9 are 17-May-2016 21:53:14.644 available at https://www.isc.org/support 17-May-2016 21:53:14.644 ---------------------------------------------------- 17-May-2016 21:53:14.645 found 2 CPUs, using 2 worker threads 17-May-2016 21:53:14.645 using 2 UDP listeners per interface 17-May-2016 21:53:14.648 using up to 4096 sockets 17-May-2016 21:53:14.681 loading configuration from '/etc/named.conf' 17-May-2016 21:53:14.683 /etc/root_trusted_key:1: unknown option 'managed-keys' 17-May-2016 21:53:14.686 loading configuration: failure 17-May-2016 21:53:14.686 exiting (due to fatal error) But named documentation and "man named.conf" both say that managed-keys were a valid option. So what's wrong here? Thanks in advance for any help. Thomas Hluchnik
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
