On 5/16/16, 5:35 PM, "MegaBrutal" <megabru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>2016-05-16 19:45 GMT+02:00 Alan Clegg <a...@clegg.com>: >> On 5/16/16, 1:30 PM, "MegaBrutal" <bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on >> behalf of megabru...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>I want to have valid reverse & forward hostnames set up >>>for this /64 subnet. >> >> This is silly. Don't do this. > >Why? Because it's too f'n big and nobody cares about PTR records if they aren't associated with an address that is actively doing something (i.e., outbound e-mail service). >Most ISPs set up reverse & forward domain names for pool addresses. In IPv4 space, sure. >OK, I'm not an ISP, but it really seems to be a widely accepted and >endorsed policy, to the point that addresses not having a reverse DNS >often treated as suspicious. I promise that the 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 addresses in your /64 aren't doing anything interesting enough for a PTR record to matter. AlanC _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
