Right. also-notify (on a master) versus allow-notify (on a slave). Different
use cases.
- Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Barry Margolin
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 5:08 PM
To: comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org
Subject: Re: also-notify and nsupdate doesnt work
In article <mailman.688.1462221733.73610.bind-us...@lists.isc.org>,
"Darcy Kevin (FCA)" <kevin.da...@fcagroup.com> wrote:
> Apologies if this has already been asked, but are you sending these
> NOTIFYs from a master which is _not_ in the "masters" clause of the
> nameserver which is receiving it? That's precisely the use case for
> "allow-notify"...
The use case for also-notify is when you have slave servers that aren't in the
NS records of the zone. Otherwise, those slaves won't update until the Refresh
timer goes off.
--
Barry Margolin
Arlington, MA
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
