On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:39 AM, John R. Levine <jo...@iecc.com> wrote:
> At the same time, the browser developers, almost without exception, refuse >> to implement SRV because they don't like the idea that they might have to >> do another DNS lookup prior to displaying a web page. And they lobby the >> W3C pretty hard to not standardize SRV for HTTP. >> >> That's a pretty serious impasse .. and one that I think is only going to >> be >> overcome by an equally strong lobbying movement from the DNS hosting >> industry, when we get tired of trying to educate end users on why CNAME at >> apex won't work (end users who don't–and shouldn't need to–care), and get >> tired of maintaining messy record synthesis processes. >> > > I don't think that's a fight you're going to win. The ANAME kludge is > ugly, but it's straightforward and a whole lot of DNS operators (including > me) do it. > > R's, > john > > I realize that ANAME seems like a kludge, but if we could make it a standard, and get the various DNS software (auth, resolvers, and clients) to understand it, it would solve a major limitation in DNS. -- Bob Harold
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
