On 2016-03-24 09:46, Ray Bellis wrote:
On 24/03/2016 16:41, Tony Finch wrote:
>When I changed our TTLs from 24h to 1h last year, it didn't have a visible
>effect on authoritative server query load, much to my surprise.
I'm not that surprised - there's definitely not a linear correlation
between the TTL of an RRset and how frequently it's queried.
Unless your TTL is very short, forced expulsion from cache (due to
cache-size limits) would cause many clients to re-query for a record far
more frequently than once-per-TTL.
Has anyone ever done any evaluation on this? For average resolvers, what
is the longest TTL that has any utility?
--
Dave Warren
http://www.hireahit.com/
http://ca.linkedin.com/in/davejwarren
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
