Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > Am 23.03.2016 um 13:36 schrieb Tony Finch: > > > > BIND does not do that - it forks too early. It's a bit tiresome > > than this is a bug in BIND which should be fixed instead worked around -
Yes. > the whol epurpose of double-forking is to signal to the caller that > initialization has finished and the process is fully read to operate No, the original purpose of double forking was to detach the process from its parent. Using daemonizing as a signal that the server is ready is a much newer idea. It is a very good idea, but not the whole idea. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ - I xn--zr8h punycode Dogger, Fisher, German Bight, Humber: Northwest backing southwest 3 or 4, increasing 5 at times. Slight, occasionally moderate. Fog patches, rain at times. Moderate or good, occasionally very poor. _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
