> On 18 Feb 2016, at 18:59, Robert Edmonds <edmo...@mycre.ws> wrote:
> 
> A large proportion of records are only ever used "once, or a handful of 
> times", according to researchers: [...]

Yes, and there's an amazing amount of crap in the cache too. About 14% of our 
cache is weird Sonicwall geoip records, which are probably only used once but 
have a 1week TTL. Sigh! They are relatively fast to re-query, though. (I wonder 
if this screws up Sonicwall's stats...)

> If there were some way to only dump the most popular records from the cache 
> (say the top 1,000 or 10,000), it would probably speed up the pre-heating 
> process significantly and still warm the cache to an acceptable degree.

Yes, that would be cool.

There's also a performance problem somewhere in adns-masterfile - it can only 
manage about 5000 qps before running out of CPU; I have done over 20000 qps 
with adns before (querying the Alexa top-1m list) so it ought to be possible to 
go a lot faster.

> Does rndc dumpdb dump the cache in DNS tree order, or could it be convinced 
> to follow the LRU order?

At the moment it is DNS tree order.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <d...@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at

_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to