Am 18.11.2015 um 16:47 schrieb Barry Margolin:
In article <mailman.2958.1447847777.26362.bind-us...@lists.isc.org>, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:when a result looks like below it needs to be fixed and "Are there any BIND specific workarounds?" is the wrong question becaus even if - the domain owner is not in the position to place workarounds somewhere elseWhile that's the pedantically correct answer, in practice it doesn't work well when your users complain "Google DNS deals with it, why don't you?" Your users don't care what happens to people somewhere else, they just want to get their work done.
the pedantically correct answer would have been "if you can't convince your DNS operator that something is wrong fire him and seek for somebody with a clue what he is doing which implies running tools like the quoted regulary"
Google understands that there are lots of broken DNS configurations out there, but their users don't want to hear that it's someone else's fault
the users shouldn't take notice of such config bugs at all because it should not last for longer than a few hours until get proactive fixed
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
