> Is that really still true? I thought that use of the Minimum field went > away when it was changed to be the negative cache TTL.
Barry, Yes, it’s still true. If you don’t set a default TTL, then the last field of the SOA record does double duty as both a default TTL and a negative caching TTL. And no RFC has ever updated its name. Chris Buxton _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
