Am 24.08.2015 um 21:09 schrieb n...@eml.cc:


On Mon, Aug 24, 2015, at 11:56 AM, Darcy Kevin (FCA) wrote:
So, if your link is saturated to the point that you can't hold up a VPN 
connection reliably, you fall back to an less-secure method of resolution?

No.

YES but you maybe don't realize the impact of your idea

Non-deterministic security, what a concept!

Didn't take long for you to resort to childish snark to did it?

not more childish than your feature request nobody ever would setup that way

Has it occurred to you, that you're giving the bad guys -- the ones that want 
to pry on your query data -- an incentive to also partially DoS your link, as a 
way to downgrade your query security?

No, because I prefer not to waste my time with hypothetical/idle speculation.

why then the original post at all instead fix the root cause?

-1 on this feature request.

I don't know who you are.  Is that an opinion, or a project decision?

an opinion

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to