On 11/08/2015 07:59, Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. wrote:
> On 2015-08-10 16:49, Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. wrote: > >> Though I realize my error not recalling that there is a middle (neutral) >> level, and which is more appropriate, since softfail is somewhere between >> fail and neutral which is not where I had intended the servers to be. > Went to fix it, only to discover that I had fixed it 1.5 years ago....maybe I > am losing my mind. Did while cleaning up SPF after an O365 verification, too. > > Thought read somewhere that the SPF RR has been discontinued. Should I, and > is it safe to, remove those now? The removal drive has been very vocal mostly from one person, a debian maintainer, it matters not if he got his own way or not, the SPF RR wont go away overnight (for example it took debian YEARS to modernise to understand that type, so it'll take em years to drop it LOL), expect it to be supported and used for many years to come, either way, it wont hurt to have it there, it will not break anything, if the code is ever removed (highly unlikely) named and co just wont care, it'll be "just another DNS RR" and ignore it. I have no intention of removing mine until such a time, if that time comes, that the code is removed from named.
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
