On 08/08/2015 01:23, Heiko Richter wrote:
> The "spf2.0/pra ?all" is SenderID, where "pra" forces the DMARC server > to check only the Envelope-Sender against "v=spf1 mx -all". If you > don't set that, SPF will always check both Envelope-From and Header-From. > >> Note that it's the SenderID specification that is horribly broken >> (btw, just because of mailing lists) and further any protocol that >> uses it (does DMARC?) >> >> Blaming the ISC mailserver for not changing header address is >> blaming it for doing something (all?) list servers did years before >> microsoft came with the braindead SenderID specification that broke >> this behaviour. > > You seem to mix up SenderID and SPF. SPF is the thing that is broken > as it always checks Envelope- and Header-From. Sender-ID is a way (the > only way) to tell SPF it should just check one of them. poppycock I've been using SPF since its very VERY early days since befopre it was even mainstream, never had a problem with mailing lists, not even the antiquated majordomo or that shitty qmail thing, the ONLY SPF "From" checking that has screwed up mailing lists is mickey$ofts piss poor attempt at going it their own with their own SPF, yeah that spf2.0 garbage, and DKIM doesnt play nice with lists either, waste of time. As much a it pains me to agree with him, Harry is right, you're full of shit.
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
