Anne Bennett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> But my parent (call it "example.com") *has* an A record;
> they use it for their web server, I believe. Will the above
> internally configured A RR not interfere with getting the
> correct data for "host -t a example.com"? Or does the sentence
> "These records are internally used to resolve names under the
> static-stub zone" imply that they are used *only* for this
> purpose, and never leaked out?
The latter. My toy nameserver has a slightly weird configration with
a recursive view containing static-stub zones pointing at its own
authoritative view, like
zone "cam.ac.uk" { type static-stub; server-addresses { ::1; }; };
And when I dig I get
; <<>> DiG 9.11.0pre-alpha <<>> +noedns +noall +cmd +comments +answer cam.ac.uk
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 41813
;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; ANSWER SECTION:
cam.ac.uk. 3457 IN A 131.111.150.25
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/
Trafalgar: Northerly or northwesterly, 4 or 5, occasionally 6 in north.
Moderate, occasionally rough in north. Fair. Good.
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users