Hi Tony, > Look at the lame-ttl option. (though I think the behaviour is more > complicated than the documentation implies)
I can report that lame-ttl doesn't help either, the timeout ttl stays at 300 secs. >From reading the manual it seems to me that a "lame server" is something different than a server not responding in time. But as you suggest it may be that the manual does not cover this completely... At least I have perfected the procedure to reproduce the behavior, it just takes me a few minutes now till I get it. Kind regards, Gerd _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
