On 04/02/2015 13:04, Tony Finch wrote: > Graham Clinch <g.cli...@lancaster.ac.uk> wrote: >> >> What does 'lame-servers: error (chase DS servers) resolving [...]' >> really mean, and is it really an error? [snip] >> In particular, I see this for the first resolution within a static-stub >> zone. > > I am not getting this error in my logs. I have a number of static-stub > zones; the interesting ones wrt DS chasing are cam.ac.uk (signed) and > private.cam.ac.uk (unsigned).
Are these static-stub zones configured with 'server-names'? Ours are 'server-addresses', and I imagine that the additional resolution caused by server-names might improve the chance of finding the DS record already cached. Graham _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
