Hello Niall, thank you for the advice. I will stay with my solution. Never touch a running system ;)
I would consider this topic as closed by now. If anyone with a similar question needs my assistance, I would be glad to help Thanks! 2015-01-05 18:27 GMT+01:00 Christian Hain <sunrisech...@gmail.com>: > Hello Niall, > > thank you for the advice. > I will stay with my solution. > Never touch a running system ;) > > I would consider this topic as closed by now. > If anyone with a similar question needs my assistance, I would be glad to > help > > Thanks! > > 2015-01-05 13:02 GMT+01:00 Niall O'Reilly <niall.orei...@ucd.ie>: > >> At Sat, 3 Jan 2015 19:24:47 +0100, >> Christian Kette wrote: >> > >> > I have found a workaround. >> > I defined a different zone for every network >> >> A simpler solution might be to use a sortlist. >> >> From the ARM: >> >> 6.2.16.13 The sortlist Statement >> >> The response to a DNS query may consist of multiple resource records >> (RRs) forming a resource records set (RRset). The name server will >> normally return the RRs within the RRset in an indeterminate order >> (but see the rrset-order statement in Section 6.2.16.14). The client >> resolver code should rearrange the RRs as appropriate, that is, using >> any addresses on the local net in preference to other >> addresses. However, not all resolvers can do this or are correctly >> configured. When a client is using a local server, the sorting can be >> performed in the server, based on the client’s address. This only >> requires configuring the name servers, not all the clients. >> >> Niall >> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
