On 11/12/14, 8:53 AM, lejeczek wrote: > hi everybody > > I'd like to ask about possible ways to protect a record - is it feasible > at all? > Or maybe some sort of priority mechanisms? > What I'd like to do is basically to not let DHCP dynamically update a > record that I set earlier manually. My case is where system has multiple > interfaces and one has statically configured IP, other interfaces are > used by qemu guests and this tends to mess things up a bit.
instead of "allow-update {};" use "update-policy {};"
http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch7/xfer.html#update-policy
AlanC
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
