In message <5411bdd6.4010...@chrysler.com>, Kevin Darcy writes: > (Yes, I'm aware that there was a proposal recently discussed on the > DNSOP list for an MX-target convention to denote "no mail service > offered here". That would presumably solve the problem I cited in the > previous paragraph. But AFAIK that proposal is many years away from > widespread adoption, and even if adopted, it puts an extra burden on the > DNS admins to populate the "no service" MX record, which, again, is > going to produce inconsistent results -- some admins will remember to do > it; many won't).
No, it's more like formalising existing practice. Universal adoption would be a long time off but there is a large existing base of MTA's that will do the right thing. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
