-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone,
On 01.08.14 15:58 Reindl Harald wrote: > the whole discussion about rndc or not rndc follow up therads and > side-threads startet after that reply below from me yesterday and > whoever brought "bounce" in the game did also not understand the > context of the discussion Calm down, everyone. Please. I did not intend to start a thread that long and, uhm, intense... My (simplified) conclusion: In most setups, using rndc is the right way, because most people do not know its advantages or the disadvantages of killing the daemon. But there is a german saying "Ausnahmen bestätigen die Regel", which could be translated as 'exceptions prove the rule'. So, those (exceptions) who really do know what they are doing can workaround rndc. Regards, Johannes - -- Multiple exclamation marks are a sure sign of diseased mind. (Terry Pratchett) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with SeaMonkey - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlPbpn0ACgkQzi3gQ/xETbK4qACeLHAGdp/yPjidlOHlMHpO+gw9 HjIAoIyYpqXq4MOuNCu6OkpHuvWbsFwL =FrGZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
