It's surprising that more organizations don't fix this--it can be a serious DoS vulnerability if the record is important enough. Anyone know of tools that, given a zone or a set of labels, will test for this behavior?

John

On 05/30/2014 11:42 AM, David A. Evans wrote:
         To my question of how many more are lurking out there.  It
looks like quite a few.  I am not sure we are going to be able to
continue with RPZ's and NSDNAME's.

          xserv.dell.com is my newest main stream web site having the
issue.

         I is behaving the same way as www.rackspace.com.   They have
DNS servers answering NXDOMAIN when they should be answering NODATA.






*David A. Evans*
*Enterprise IP/DNS Management*
*Network Infrastructure Tools and Services*
*(309) 675-9700 *
*_Evans_David_A@cat.com_* <mailto:evans_davi...@cat.com>

bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org wrote on 05/28/2014 03:09:54 PM:

 > From: "David A. Evans" <evans_davi...@cat.com>
 > To: bind-us...@isc.org
 > Date: 05/28/2014 03:10 PM
 > Subject: Re: RPZ and www.rackspace.com
 > Sent by: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
 >
 > CATERPILLAR SECURITY ALERT: The email address in the sender line
 > does not match the account that sent the email. This can be an
 > indication of phishing. Do not click links or open attachments
 > unless you are certain it is from a safe source. Learn more at
 > security.cat.com/phishing
 >         Rack Space appears to have fixed the issue.    "dig
 > www.wip.rackspace.com NS"  now returns NO DATA instead of NXDOMAIN.
 >
 >         I wonder how many more are lurking out there.
 >
 >
 >         We are still getting a trickle in of complaints about
 > slowness and failures that appear to be related to the RPZ and the
 > amount of time it takes to complete all the extra queries for the
 > NSDNAME checks.   When we research these they seem to fit into 2 groups.
 >
 >
 >         1.   DNS zones with "slightly" broken infrastructure.  These
 > would be domains with either slow response from one or more name
 > servers or not responding name servers.  A recursive resolver
 > without RPZ loaded can work though the issue but the extra lookups
 > required primarily for the NSDNAME increases the query time to the
 > point where DNS times out from the client perspective.    I can't
 > really see a fix here,  the issue does reside with the domain owner,
 > we are simply more susceptible to the issue because of the RPZ's.
 >
 >         2.  DNS zones with a large number of NS records and the name
 > servers have FQDN's in several different DNS zones.
 >
 > www.domain.com          NS        ns1.domain1.com
 >     NS        ns2.domain2.com
 >     NS        ns3.domain3.net  .....
 >
 >         These are the most frustrating as there is really nothing
 > wrong with this setup in my opinion.   This is just going to
 > generate a huge number of DNS lookups to do a full NSDNAME check.
 > These are hard to explain away as they "work from home" and "work
 > from my phone".
 >
 >
 >         Have others found similar issues when implementing RPZ's?
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > David A. Evans
 > Enterprise IP/DNS Management
 > Network Infrastructure Tools and Services
 >
 >
 >
 > Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote on 05/07/2014 10:44:05 AM:
 >
 > > From: Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org>
 > > To: "David A. Evans" <evans_davi...@cat.com>
 > > Cc: bind-us...@isc.org
 > > Date: 05/07/2014 10:44 AM
 > > Subject: Re: RPZ and www.rackspace.com
 > >
 > >
 > > In message <OFDC3C86D9.D668B707-ON86257CD1.005339FC-86257CD1.
 > > 00543...@notes.cat.com>, "David A. Evans" writes:
 > > >
 > > >         I've done some more troubleshooting with info from people
that
 > > > responded directly to me and not to the list.    This can be
reproduced
 > > > without any RPZ loaded by mimicking the behavior of the RPZ lookups
 > > > required to validate NSDNAME lines.
 > > >
 > > > Issue these 'digs' within 30 second of each other.
 > > >
 > > > dig www.wip.rackspace.com
 > > > www.wip.rackspace.com.  30      IN      A 173.203.44.116
 > > >
 > > > dig www.wip.rackspace.com NS
 > > > (NXDOMAIN)
 > > >
 > > > dig www.wip.rackspace.com
 > > > (NXDOMAIN)
 > > >
 > > >
 > > >         I think this is another case of miss configured load
balancers.
 > > > Shouldn't the NS record lookup respond with a NODATA response and
not
 > > > NXDOMAIN?
 > >
 > > Yes.  The name exists.
 > >
 > > >         That still doesn't really answer why a site as big as
 > > > www.rackspace.comisn't getting hit with support issues on
theirweb site.
 > > >  It only took us about 4 hours into our first production day with
 > > > NSDNAME's in our RPZ to get a call about www.rackspace.comnot
loading.
 > >
 > > Because NS queries are not common with normal DNS lookups.  For
 > > some reason people that deploy load balancers think they don't need
 > > to fix issues like this.  Send something other than a A record and
 > > you get:
 > >
 > >    - NXDOMAIN being returned when the name exists.
 > >    - NOTIMP being returned.
 > >      (Really you can't just send NODATA?)
 > >    - REFUSED being returned.
 > >      (Really you don't want to tell us the record does not exist?)
 > >    - the wrong SOA being returned.
 > >    - malformed RDATA with the content being the A record content.
 > >
 > > Mark
 > >
 > > > David A. Evans
 > > > Enterprise IP/DNS Management
 > > > Network Infrastructure Tools and Services
 > > > evans_davi...@cat.com
 > > >
 > > >
 > > >
 > > > From:   "David A. Evans" <evans_davi...@cat.com>
 > > > To:     bind-users@lists.isc.org
 > > > Date:   05/07/2014 09:11 AM
 > > > Subject:        RPZ and www.rackspace.com
 > > > Sent by:        bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
 > > >
 > > >
 > > >
 > > > CATERPILLAR SECURITY ALERT: The email address in the sender
linedoes not
 > > > match the account that sent the email. This can be an indication of
 > > > phishing. Do not click links or open attachments unless you are
 > certain it
 > > > is from a safe source. Learn more at security.cat.com/phishing
 > > >         We have just enabled RPZ with some NSDNAME checks and are
seeing
 > > > an issue resolving www.rackspace.com.
 > > >
 > > >         The first lookup is successful and returns both the CNAME
and the
 > > > A record.  The second query, within a second of the first, will only
 > > > return the CNAME.  It will only return the CNAME until the TTL of
the A
 > > > record times out.  The first query, when it actually has to go
out and do
 > > > recursion will always work.   Answering from cache will always
fail. When
 > > > you inspect the cache during the time that it is only returning
 > the CNAME,
 > > > the record in cache is "www.wip.rackspace.com type ANY
 > NXDOMAIN".    This
 > > > only happens with RPZ's enabled and query hitting a RPZ zone with a
 > > > NSDNAME line.   Turning off RPZ or whitelisting the lookup via
RPZ before
 > > > it hits a RPZ with NSDNAME allows the query to be successful 100%
of the
 > > > time.
 > > >
 > > >
 > > >         Can anyone else verify this behavior?   What is going on
with
 > > > www.rackspace.com?  If this is a miss configuration on
Rackspace's DNS
 > > > servers how are they not getting hit with support calls like crazy?
 > > >
 > > >
 > > >
 > > > dig @redacted.cat.com www.rackspace.com
 > > >
 > > > ; <<>> DiG 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.17.rc1.el6_4.6 <<>>
@redacted.cat.com
 > > > www.rackspace.com
 > > > ; (1 server found)
 > > > ;; global options: +cmd
 > > > ;; Got answer:
 > > > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 30337
 > > > ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
 > > >
 > > > ;; QUESTION SECTION:
 > > > ;www.rackspace.com.             IN      A
 > > >
 > > > ;; ANSWER SECTION:
 > > > www.rackspace.com.      300     IN      CNAME www.wip.rackspace.com.
 > > > www.wip.rackspace.com.  30      IN      A 173.203.44.116
 > > >
 > > > ;; Query time: 193 msec
 > > > ;; SERVER: redacted
 > > > ;; WHEN: Wed May  7 08:53:08 2014
 > > > ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 73
 > > >
 > > >
 > > >
 > > > dig @redacted.cat.com www.rackspace.com
 > > >
 > > > ; <<>> DiG 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.17.rc1.el6_4.6 <<>>
@redacted.cat.com
 > > > www.rackspace.com
 > > > ; (1 server found)
 > > > ;; global options: +cmd
 > > > ;; Got answer:
 > > > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 25905
 > > > ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
 > > >
 > > > ;; QUESTION SECTION:
 > > > ;www.rackspace.com.             IN      A
 > > >
 > > > ;; ANSWER SECTION:
 > > > www.rackspace.com.      298     IN      CNAME www.wip.rackspace.com.
 > > >
 > > > ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
 > > > wip.rackspace.com.      58  IN      SOA www-gtm-ord1.rackspace.com.
 > > > hostmaster.305181-GTM1.rackspace.com. 86 10800 3600 604800 60
 > > >
 > > > ;; Query time: 2 msec
 > > > ;; SERVER: redacted
 > > > ;; WHEN: Wed May  7 08:53:10 2014
 > > > ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 129
 > > >
 > > >
 > > > David A. Evans
 > > > Enterprise IP/DNS Management
 > > > Network Infrastructure Tools and Services
 > > > evans_davi...@cat.com _______________________________________________
 > > > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-usersto
 > > > unsubscribe from this list
 > > >
 > > > bind-users mailing list
 > > > bind-users@lists.isc.org
 > > > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
 > > >
 > > > --=_alternative 0054318186257CD1_=
 > > > Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
 > > > _______________________________________________
 > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-usersto
 > unsubscribe from this list
 >
 > bind-users mailing list
 > bind-users@lists.isc.org
 > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to