The only remotely valid use case that I have found was the default DNS monitoring rule for OpenNMS and other monitoring applications. Such a shame.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Marco Davids (SIDN) <marco.dav...@sidn.nl> wrote: > To me, an NXDOMAIN-reply seems better On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Mitchell Kuch <mi...@basejp.com> wrote: > Hello - > > I've adopted a number of zones and most of them contain "localhost in > a 127.0.0.1" records. I'm curious what current RFC standards state and > what the community considers best practice. RFC1537 states that zones > should contain a localhost record, but it seems that practice was > obsoleted by RFC1912. Is anyone aware of negative consequences with > leaving such records in place, perhaps a XSS vulnerability? > > I'm itching to remove the records but thought I'd check to see if > there was a legacy use case. > > Regards, > Mitchell _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
