On Dec 12 2013, Thomas Schulz wrote:
Sorry for the bad advice.
Am I correct in thinking that in the case of a hidden master and a chain
of slaves, that the first publicly acessable slave would do the signing
and that in any case only one instance of bind should do the signing?
It would be strange to have signing done in more than one place, yes.
The sort of scenario when you want to do signing on a slave is that
in "Example 2" in https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00626/
--
Chris Thompson
Email: c...@cam.ac.uk
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
