In message <2e1626be-94f8-44e8-a73c-6521c44ba...@conundrum.com>, Matthew Pounsett writes: > > On 2013-12-05, at 01:37 , Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote: > > > > >>> Note, named will for the use of TCP in its UDP response. > > > > s/for/force/ > > Always? Regardless of response size? Interesting. What's the rationale > for doing it that way?
Because TCP is always checksummed. UDP isn't. -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
