In message <caektlisj_2j-rtot_2gtixn6hl4pbkjswdw3yogfl1djfc2...@mail.gmail.com>, Casey Deccio writes: > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote: > > > > > Use a DNAME record. That works with DNSSEC. > > > > > Thanks for the suggestion. I would use DNAME, except the old namespace > will still have names under it, and names are not allowed to exist below a > DNAME. In other words, we're not replacing the old namespace, we're just > minimizing its scope and use.
Then I suggest that you just add CNAMEs whenever you remove other record. Once a part of the namespace only have CNAME/DNAME below it replace it with a DNAME. You will converge on the earlier example. > Casey -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
