> From: Noel Butler <noel.but...@ausics.net> > We used to run our int bl on bind, it was a resource hog compared to > rbldnsd > But there is no way in hell, I'd run rbldnsd on anything else other > than a BL, > > IMO, they are both designed to do different things, and they both do > their own thing, much better than the other because if it.
10 years ago rbldnsd was the right choice for a DNSBL. Today rbldnsd is an egregious mistake engrained the uninformed and unexamined preconceptions and prejudices of DNSBL users. The hand wringing about IPv6 spam ending the usefulness of DNSBLs and the proposals to put B-trees into the DNS wire protocol make only if you assume that rsync is the only way to distribute DNSBL data and that wildcards cannot be used in DNSBLs because rbldnsd didn't like them and that rsync is the only way to distribute DNSBL data. Vernon Schryver v...@rhyolite.com _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
