On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 23:40 +0000, Evan Hunt wrote: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 09:20:29AM +1000, Noel Butler wrote: > > I have been using this since 9.9.4bx, and although documentation is/was > > lacking at the time, so there might be a whitelisting somewhere , but in > > its absence, I highly advise against using RRL if your mail servers use > > those DNS servers > > A mail server should be talking to a caching resolver, not an > authoritative DNS server; RRL is for authoritaive servers. So the > situation shouldn't ordinarily arise. >
Yes true, but in some cases, some servers are both, using views, try tell a small business with 3 staff and only a combined mail/web, plus one DNS (I act as secondary so that saves them a bit) that they need to install another server, dedicated to caching if they insist of having this feature enabled :) - this resembles countless small business and SOHO setups, so it would be advantageous in future releases if it can not currently, be configured using views.
<<attachment: face-smile.png>>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
