I think DynDNS meets all your requirements. They had pretty good service and a solid infrastructure.
At a certain point, you pay based on the queries per second, which is the only reason we migrated our DNS in-house. It's otherwise pretty cheap for what you get. On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Matthew Huff <mh...@ox.com> wrote: > Within the last few years, we have drastically reduced our DNS footprint, as > well as our datacenter size. We are looking to migrate our primary DNS to a > provider, but I'm having trouble finding ones that meet our requirements > > 1) Provide primary DNS without necessary being the registar for the domain > 2) Provide primary DNS for both forward and reverse zones. > 3) Support IPv4 and IPv6 records > 4) Provide IPv6 nameservers (not required, but nice to have) > 5) Allow arbitrary RR records such as SPF, TXT, etc... > > Any suggestions? > > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe > from this list > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users -- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
