On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 08:50 -0500, Barry S. Finkel wrote: > > This was discussed here already, and imho this is anti-spf bullshit like > > all those "spf breaks forwarding" FUD. The SPF RR is already here and is > > preferred over TXT that is generik RR type, unlike SPF. > > > It is not Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt that "SPF breaks forwarding". > SPF *DOES* break forwarding. I have a case I am researching right now > where forwarded mail is undeliverable due to SPF checking at the > new destination. >
Nothing is perfect, every single gmail user coming via mailing lists also fails DKIM. There is no magic answer, but I wish more would enforce SPF, especially banks, but cant expect them to have any clue, their only expertise is ripping people off.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
