On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 17:20 +0100, Phil Mayers wrote: > On 25/06/13 16:53, John Horne wrote: > > > servers. However, there is a whole load of muttering that Microsoft and > > AD won't like that; it's all integrated with each other; running the DNS > > zone on Linux servers will be a problem with the MS servers etc etc. > > I'm sure you know this, but just in case - that is FUD. > Yes, so I gather. Unfortunately because I deal with the Linux side of things, I don't carry much weight here at all when trying to point out that we can integrate the MS stuff with the Linux servers.
> As long as you setup appropriate dynamic update ACLs, AD works fine with bind > DNS > servers. > That is my understanding, and I have been saying it for a very long time now. It may well be that our current problem, despite the fact it took someone external to point it out!, is enough to get our DNS correctly sorted out (with respect to visible/accessible name servers). > Happy to discuss this offline if it helps. > Okay, thanks. The guy who knows the most about our AD/Exchange setup is on hols for the week, but I'll let him know when he returns. John. -- John Horne, Plymouth University, UK Tel: +44 (0)1752 587287 Fax: +44 (0)1752 587001 _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
