In message <51bbb83a.7040...@dougbarton.us>, Doug Barton writes: > Personally I've never understood why RRL wasn't already baked in. The > only way a legitimate client could send the same query over and over in > a short period of time (intentionally being vague on both terms) is that > it is broken. We did the smart thing to solve that problem on the > iterative side 10 years ago, I don't know why it's taken so long to > solve the auth side. :) Actually it isn't especially with NATs, firewalls that drop EDNS packets etc.
Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
