> -----Original Message----- > From: bind-users-bounces+gburnore=netbasix....@lists.isc.org > [mailto:bind-users-bounces+gburnore=netbasix....@lists.isc.org] On > Behalf Of Dave Warren > Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 12:02 AM > To: Bind Users Mailing List > Subject: NS geo-distribution > > Thoughts about how to best distribute NS servers hosting authoritative > data for our zones? We currently host only about 300 zones so all zones > live on all 3 servers but we're looking at replacing 1-2 of our NS > servers due to reliability of the current servers. > > My thinking is to just pick three sites in Canada/US with good > connectivity and host there, but I'm getting some pressure to pick a > location in EU as well. > > With the vast majority of our customers being in North America > (probably 75% of users are in Canada), would it make sense to add a > Europe based NS or would this tend to return slower results on average > since a potential user would have a 1/3 chance of hitting a NS with a > higher latency? > > I realize that the difference isn't very significant in the grand > scheme of things, but it's always nice to shave a few ms off of initial > page load times.
I would contend that fast inititial page load times is achieved through blazing web servers and a wide data path. _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
