On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 15:03 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote: > In message <1364786722.6226.2.camel@tardis>, Noel Butler writes: > > > > On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 21:21 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Ignore them. They will be addressed in the next maintenance release. > > > > > > > > > it was, but now seems to have reared its ugly head again in 9.9.2-p2 > > > > Apr 1 12:20:35 fox named[589]: RSA_verify failed > > Apr 1 12:20:35 fox named[589]: error:04077068:rsa > > routines:RSA_verify:bad signature:rsa_sign.c:263: > > Apr 1 12:20:35 fox named[589]: RSA_verify failed > > Apr 1 12:20:35 fox named[589]: error:04077068:rsa > > routines:RSA_verify:bad signature:rsa_sign.c:263: > > BIND 9.7.7 and BIND 9.9.2 were both released at the same time (Oct > 9, 2012). > > BIND 9.9.2-P1 and BIND 9.9.2-P2 are security releases. > > The betas of the next maintenance release 9.9.3b1 and 9.9.3b2 > contain the fix. >
Using 9.9.3b3 on one nameserver now, yes all seems good Have always used the latest version, applied a patch you gave me earlier, could of sworn it was fixed, unless I applied two patches and didnt think about second one. If b3 remains stable after a few days I'll throw it on main production. Cheers
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
