Is there any practical difference between the following two: 1. example.com. NS ns1.example.com. example.com. NS ns2.example.com. ns1.example.com. A 1.1.1.1 ns2.example.com. A 1.1.1.2
2. example.com. NS ns.example.com. ns.example.com. A 1.1.1.1 ns.example.com. A 1.1.1.2 Is there any possible difference in the resolvers behavior ? How bind9(10?) threats that ? If someone knows about not-bind DNS resolvers I'd be happy to know that too. Reason: We run a public DNS hosting. I think it would be more user-friendly if once we add more nameservers, we would just add them as A records under the same ns1/ns2, instead of advising each user to add ns3..nsX to their parent zones. Thanks, Alexander Gurvitz, net-me.net
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users