BIND now comes with a baked in roots file (in the imaginatively named lib/dns/rootns.c )
There is no need for a named.root file, and is just another thing to go wrong… W On Feb 14, 2013, at 8:35 AM, Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com> wrote: > The Centos 6.3 bind and bind-chroot do not seem to come with a named.root. > Does have a named.ca, though. > > So from my old named.root.hints include (also not provided; where did I get > this?) I tried: > > wget ftp://ftp.rs.internic.net/domain/named.root > > And got a nice looking named.root last updated 1/3/2013, with nice comments > on who use to run the various root servers. > > Then I tried: > > dig . ns @198.41.0.4 > named.root > > I see where this addr is the A root server, anyway, the response did not have > A records for B, E, I, J, or L !!! And of course no AAAA records for I, J, or > L. It has NS records for A thru M. > > What went wrong here? > > Which do I use? > > > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe > from this list > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users > -- "Does Emacs have the Buddha nature? Why not? It has bloody well everything else..." _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
