Precisely ! That is why one of the sanity checks is if NS records exist at all. If not, no DS records will be added.
And reversely : if all NS records are removed, any DS record will be removed as well. Just as Mark Andrews indicated. Kind regards, Marc Lampo On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Phil Mayers <p.may...@imperial.ac.uk> wrote: > On 02/06/2013 12:56 AM, Doug Barton wrote: > >>> I do the following as an example: >>> >>> nsupdate -d >>> server <ip addr> >>> zone test.net >>> update add subzone.test.net 9999 IN DS 34845 7 1 >>> 325AA7B83FAC7DB621678EB2FB9035B51A0A504F >> >> >> I don't think this makes sense. Shouldn't you have a proper zone for >> subzone.test.net? What utility would a DS record have in this location? >> > > Eh? DS records always live in the parent zone, exactly like delegating NS > records. > > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to > unsubscribe from this list > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
