All, On Friday, 2013-01-18 10:01:49 +0000, "Niall O'Reilly" <niall.orei...@ucd.ie> wrote: > > On 18 Jan 2013, at 06:27, Jan-Piet Mens wrote: > > >> Could "CLI utility" be man(1) and info(1)? :-) > > > > It could, yes, but `b10-msg NNN` isn't going to break BIND 10's > > development budget (I hope), > > +1 > > > and I feel it to be more practical than > > scrolling through a man page with 900+ error-messages in it. ;) > > I'm not sure I see the big practical advantage over > 'C-S' in info or '/' in the pager invoked by man. > > I would see the man page as indispensible, and a bespoke > utility as merely cool.
Okay, I think both of these suggestions are straightforward and make sense. (Meaning a utility and a "man" page.) I've created tickets for them so we can make these. https://bind10.isc.org/ticket/2639 https://bind10.isc.org/ticket/2640 -- Shane _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
