That is true by default rrset-order is cyclic I believe. And even if it replies randomly I guess we will have to NAT the traffic on firewall for particular IPs -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks and Regards, Manish R
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Barry Margolin <bar...@alum.mit.edu>wrote: > In article <mailman.897.1355501135.11945.bind-us...@lists.isc.org>, > "Novosielski, Ryan" <novos...@umdnj.edu> wrote: > > > Won't the DNS server randomly report the the defined IP addresses? > > RFC 6186 is about using SRV records, not round-robin DNS. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Barry Margolin [mailto:bar...@alum.mit.edu] > > Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 10:49 AM > To: comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org > > <comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org> > > Subject: Re: Can we load balance traf[f]ic for CNAME records? > > > > In article <mailman.885.1355477939.11945.bind-us...@lists.isc.org>, > > SM <s...@resistor.net> wrote: > > > > > See RFC 6186. Verify whether the mail clients support that > specification. > > > > Are there any mail clients that support this yet? > > -- > Barry Margolin > Arlington, MA > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to > unsubscribe from this list > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users >
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
