I see no problems. [ec2-user@domU-12-31-39-06-2E-64 ~]$ time dig www.kentlaw.iit.edu
; <<>> DiG 9.7.0-P2-RedHat-9.7.0-5.P2.6.amzn1 <<>> www.kentlaw.iit.edu ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 54160 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;www.kentlaw.iit.edu. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: www.kentlaw.iit.edu. 86400 IN A 64.131.119.9 ;; Query time: 847 msec ;; SERVER: 200.51.197.187#53(200.51.197.187) ;; WHEN: Mon Nov 26 19:23:46 2012 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 53 *real 0m0.854s* user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.008s [ec2-user@domU-12-31-39-06-2E-64 ~]$ time dig kentlaw.iit.edu ; <<>> DiG 9.7.0-P2-RedHat-9.7.0-5.P2.6.amzn1 <<>> kentlaw.iit.edu ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 39163 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;kentlaw.iit.edu. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: kentlaw.iit.edu. 86400 IN A 64.131.119.9 ;; Query time: 780 msec ;; SERVER: 200.51.197.187#53(200.51.197.187) ;; WHEN: Mon Nov 26 19:24:11 2012 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 49 *real 0m0.799s* user 0m0.004s sys 0m0.016s [ec2-user@domU-12-31-39-06-2E-64 ~]$ Hope that helps. regards Saludos.- Leonardo Santagostini <http://ar.linkedin.com/in/santagostini> 2012/11/26 Chuck Swiger <cswi...@mac.com> > Hi-- > > On Nov 26, 2012, at 10:12 AM, Adamiec, Lawrence wrote: > > The report must also address these two specific questions: > > > > • Why does www.kentlaw.iit.edu load quicker than kentlaw.iit.eduin > > any browser? > > • What happens if we remove the forwarders option from named.conf? > > I can't duplicate the issue in Q1 and I'm trying to determine a way of > testing Q2. > > Q1 isn't related to DNS performance; both of the names you mention resolve > to the same IP address via an A record. There wasn't a significant > difference in response time I saw by loading the webpages (both took ~1.3 s > per curl), but one likely could improve webserver performance by running > Apache, nginx, or almost anything else instead of than Microsoft's IIS. > > The domain seems to be missing A records for your nameservers, however: > > http://www.dnsvalidation.com/reports/50b3b5167d79ee02b8000026 > > As for Q2, it depends on whether the nameservers you are pointing to do > better in caching queries then your local nameservers would doing recursive > lookups for themselves. If the local nameservers have poor connectivity > compared to the forwarders, maybe, otherwise it's probably not helpful to > use forwarders. > > Regards, > -- > -Chuck > > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to > unsubscribe from this list > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users >
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
